ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
A preliminary study on contrast characteristics and clinical application of bedside transthoracic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in iatrogenic cardiac tamponade.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Iatrogenic cardiac tamponade (ICT) is a life-threatening complication requiring rapid intervention. Although conventional echocardiography can aid in diagnosis, its ability to assess bleeding points is limited. Bedside contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) improves diagnostic accuracy by observing myocardial perfusion and active extravasation. This study evaluated the impact of CEUS on treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in patients with ICT. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 84 ICT patients, comparing a group that underwent CEUS-guided management (n=29) with a control group (n=55). Baseline characteristics, echocardiographic findings, treatment modalities, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Furthermore, the study correlated specific CEUS imaging patterns with therapeutic decisions and patient prognosis. Results: The CEUS group had significantly lower surgical rates (17.2% Conclusions: Bedside CEUS significantly optimizes the management of ICT by reducing unnecessary surgical procedures and improving survival rates. The technique provides critical, real-time insights that support individualized treatment strategies, demonstrating substantial value in emergency clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.