Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147888›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Transferring thrombus labels from CTPA to non-contrast CT via accurate pulmonary vessel registration: a critical step toward AI-based pulmonary embolism detection.

Xiaobin Gong, Bingzhen Jia, Yuyang Zhang, Baolin Tan, Anwei He, Zhaoxiang Ye, Zhiheng Xing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaobin Gong *Haihe Clinical School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Bingzhen Jia *Department of Radiology, Tianjin Haihe Hospital, TCM Key Research Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention for State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Haihe Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yuyang ZhangHaihe Clinical School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Baolin TanDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Haihe Hospital, TCM Key Research Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention for State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Haihe Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Anwei HeFirst Department of Radiology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhaoxiang YeDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer/State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhiheng XingHaihe Clinical School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality with a low early diagnosis rate, highlighting the urgent need for more efficient detection methods. Non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) offers a promising alternative to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) but requires accurate image registration for artificial intelligence (AI) model training. This study evaluates and compares three commonly used image registration algorithms (Elastix, ANTs, and Demons) to determine their efficacy in aligning pulmonary arteries on CTPA and NCCT images for potential AI applications in PE detection. Methods: This retrospective study included 324 PE patients diagnosed via CTPA across three hospitals. Pulmonary arteries and their branches were segmented on NCCT and CTPA images using Totalsegmentator with manual radiologist review. Three registration algorithms (Elastix, ANTs, Demons) were compared against rigid registration. Accuracy was assessed using Dice coefficient, Jaccard similarity [Intersection over Union (IoU)], 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and clinical physician scores (1-5 scale). Pairwise comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with rank biserial correlation for effect size calculation. Results: Elastix demonstrated significantly superior performance compared to ANTs and Demons across all metrics. Elastix achieved Dice coefficient of 0.819±0.030 Conclusions: Among the evaluated registration methods, Elastix showed the highest accuracy and clinical applicability for transferring thrombus landmarks from enhanced CTPA to NCCT images (Dice =0.819, IoU =0.695, HD95 =3.42 mm, all P<0.001

Indexed as

algorithm evaluationartificial intelligence (AI)image registrationPulmonary embolism (PE)unenhanced chest computed tomography (unenhanced chest CT)

Identifiers

PMID42147888
PMCPMC13178320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.