ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Development and validation of radiomics models for the diagnoses of breast lesions with calcification on ultrasound.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-frequency ultrasound (US) technology has enhanced the visualization of breast calcification; however, the understanding of these calcifications among sonographers remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of US images for breast lesions with calcification via a radiomics approach. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed breast lesions with calcification (verified on mammography) at a single center. Additionally, 56 lesions from the public Breast Ultrasound Image Dataset (BUSI) served as the external test set. Regions of interest (ROIs) for lesions and calcifications were delineated on the US image respectively and used for feature extraction. Pathological findings and follow-up assessments were used as the diagnostic criteria for benign and malignant lesions. Radiomics models were developed using lesion, calcification, and fusion features based on six machine learning algorithms. In addition to the receiver operating characteristic curve and other metrics, a reader study was performed to evaluate the model performance. Results: A total of 508 US images of breast lesions from 490 women (mean age, 52.1±11.0 years) were included. Among the 919 extracted two-dimensional radiomics features, 44, 14, and 23 features were selected to construct the calcification-based, lesion-based, and fusion-based models, respectively. The fusion strategy outperformed the other two strategies across most algorithms and exhibited enhanced diagnostic performance on both test sets. In terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the fusion models significantly outperformed the calcification-based models for the Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms on the internal test set (both P<0.05), and significantly outperformed the lesion-based models for the Bootstrap Aggregation (BAG) and Logistic Regression (LR) algorithms on the external test set (both P<0.05). Notably, the AUC of the representative BAG model improved significantly after incorporating calcification features, increasing from 0.679 to 0.770 on the external test set (P<0.05), which was comparable to the performance of most experienced sonographers. Conclusions: Fusing features of lesion and calcification on US images enhance the predictive efficacy of radiomics models, indicating the additional value of calcification in diagnosing breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.