ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Accuracy and Actionability of TikTok Content on Cosmetic Limb Lengthening: A Comparison between Healthcare Professional and Non-professional Sources.
Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the modern digital era, social media platforms, such as TikTok, have become significant sources of medical information for the general public. This study explores the content of TikTok videos related to cosmetic limb lengthening to understand the quality and accuracy of information shared. Methods: The 50 most-viewed English-language videos tagged with #Heightsurgery and #lengtheningsurgery on TikTok were analysed by two independent reviewers. The analysis covered creator demographics, video format, and predominant themes. Each video was also evaluated for medical accuracy and scored for clarity and actionability using the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT). Results: The selected videos amassed 186.5 million views, 7.9 million 'likes,' 1,52,000 'shares,' and 67,000 comments. Nearly half (47%) were produced by healthcare professionals (HCPs), with orthopaedic surgeons accounting for 70% of the HCP contributors (32.9% of total creators). Medically accurate content was found in 60% of all videos, with 80% of HCP videos featuring accurate information. Educational content dominated (72%), with the remainder being anecdotal (28%). Tone varied, with videos presenting either positive (50%), negative (32%), or neutral (18%) perspectives. Common themes included post-operative experiences (30%), medical education (15%), surgical techniques (12%), risks vs benefits (10%), and treatments for achondroplasia (10%). Concerns about pain, fear, permanent injury (24%), cost (10%), and a lack of understanding of procedures (10%) were also frequently mentioned. Notably, there was no focus on racial or socio-economic barriers in any of the videos. The average understandability and actionability scores, according to the PEMAT, were 67.5 and 67.15%, respectively. Conclusions: The widespread popularity of these videos underscores the growing role of social media in disseminating medical information. This analysis highlights the need for HCPs to leverage platforms like TikTok to provide accurate, reliable information and address common concerns, misconceptions, and fears surrounding cosmetic limb lengthening. How to cite this article: Ramlawi AA, Sidani M, Missi C,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.