Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147740›Full record

ReviewJournal of parasitology research2026

Species Diversity and Geographical Distribution of Poultry Ascaridids: A Scoping Review.

Chet Raj Pathak, Deb Prasad Pandey, Prabhat Khanal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chet Raj PathakDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, afu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1436-7278
Deb Prasad PandeyDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, afu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7162-8581
Prabhat KhanalFaculty Biosciences and Aquaculture (FBA), Nord University, Steinkjer, Norway, nord.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6774-0503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry nematodes, particularly Ascaridid species, significantly affect avian health and productivity and are widely distributed globally. Yet despite over 80% of poultry in developing countries being raised under extensive rearing systems, knowledge on infection risks posed by different poultry nematodes remains limited. This scoping review synthesizes the knowledge based on the evaluation of existing literature, consolidating insights into the diverse Ascaridid species infecting poultry and their distribution, thereby contributing to the broader comprehension and management of avian nematodes. We found a total of 11 nematode species infecting 8 host types having median prevalence of 24% (IQR: 41.07%-12%).

Indexed as

Ascaridia sppdistributionsdiversityHeterakis sppnematodes

Identifiers

PMID42147740
PMCPMC13179451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.