ArticleJournal of parasitology research2026
Zoonotic Risk of Intestinal Parasites in Ghana's Protected Areas: A Nexus for Human-Nonhuman Primates-Dog Interactions.
Article in Journal of parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zoonotic Risk of Intestinal Parasites in Ghana's Protected Areas: A Nexus for Human-Nonhuman Primates-Dog Interactions.Journal of parasitology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal parasites with zoonotic potential and the risk factors associated with their transmission pose a significant health threat to humans, nonhuman primates, and dogs living in or around protected areas. This study is aimed at determining the prevalence, species richness, and associated risk factors of the interaction between humans, nonhuman primates, and dogs in Boabeng Fiema, Mole National Park, and Shai Hills reserve resources. A cross-sectional study was used to collect stool samples and questionnaire data. The stool was analyzed using a formal ether sedimentation method, and a stratified questionnaire was used to assess the risk factors associated with the interaction between the three hosts in and around the three protected areas. Using R software, the chi-square test was used to evaluate the significance of associations with dog management, hygiene, and sanitation practices. Prevalence in humans was 10.56% in Boabeng Fiema, 44.94% in Mole National Park, and 58.13% in Shai Hills; dogs and nonhuman primates carried higher burdens (dogs: 89.59%, 82.14%, and 27.27%; nonhuman primates: 60.78%, 42.85%, and 47.72%, respectively). Hookworms and ascarids were the common parasites shared among all three hosts. Shai Hills recorded the highest species richness. Parasites identified in the study were strongylids, hookworms,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.