ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026
Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Different Music Therapy Interventions for Delirium in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter in Response to the Article: Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Different Music Therapy Interventions for Delirium in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Delirium is common in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with worse outcomes. Music-based interventions are increasingly used, but the relative effectiveness of different programs remains unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare multiple music therapy interventions for ICU delirium. Data sources: We searched major Chinese and English databases (e.g., CNKI, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library) from inception to 21 August 2025. Study selection: Randomized controlled trials comparing music-based interventions with usual care (UC) in adults (≥18 years) in the ICU were eligible. Interventions were categorized as simple music (SM) therapy, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) five-element music, family voice stimulation combined with music (FS), and combined music (CM) therapy (music combined with another nonpharmacological component). Data synthesis: A frequentist random-effects NMA (R, netmeta) was performed. Compared with UC, all music-based interventions were associated with a reduced delirium incidence [CM: Risk ratio (RR) = 0.43; TCM: RR = 0.45; FS: RR = 0.48; SM: RR = 0.51]. For delirium duration, CM [mean difference (MD) = -3.21 days] and TCM (MD = -2.89 days) showed statistically significant reductions, whereas SM and FS did not. The network ranking suggested CM had the highest probability of benefit; however, between-intervention differences were mainly supported by indirect comparisons and small trials. Heterogeneity and potential small-study effects were observed. Conclusion: Music-based interventions may reduce ICU delirium incidence, and some programs may shorten delirium duration. Because evidence is limited by heterogeneity, possible publication bias, and a paucity of head-to-head trials, rankings should be interpreted cautiously. Well-designed, multicenter RCTs with standardized protocols are needed before firm recommendations can be made. How to cite this article: Hao Y, Song R, Wang A. Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Different Music Therapy Interventions for Delirium in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2026;30(4):335-343.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.