Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147683›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Non-resolving Pulmonary Consolidation Mimicking Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Pitfall Revealing Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Vedant Saxena, Anil Sontakke, Saood Ali

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vedant SaxenaRespiratory Medicine, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND.
Anil SontakkeRespiratory Medicine, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND.
Saood AliRespiratory Medicine, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains highly prevalent in endemic regions; however, current international and national guidelines emphasize microbiological confirmation prior to initiation of anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) whenever feasible. Empirical treatment without microbiological confirmation represents a deviation from recommended standards and may contribute to diagnostic delay. We report a 52-year-old male presenting with chronic cough with mucoid expectoration and progressive dyspnea without fever, hemoptysis, or weight loss. Despite negative sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear and cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test (CBNAAT), the patient was empirically initiated on ATT based on clinicoradiological suspicion. Lack of clinical and radiological response prompted further evaluation. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) demonstrated persistent consolidation with perilymphatic nodules and interlobular septal thickening. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed metabolically active pulmonary lesions with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and a suspicious adrenal lesion. CT-guided biopsy confirmed moderately differentiated lung adenocarcinoma. Molecular analysis revealed a KRAS mutation with negative programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. This case underscores the importance of adherence to diagnostic guidelines, early reconsideration of diagnosis in non-resolving consolidation, and the critical role of timely tissue diagnosis in preventing delays in oncological management.

Indexed as

kras mutationlung adenocarcinomanodular opacitiesnon-resolving pneumoniatuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID42147683
PMCPMC13173621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.