ArticleCureus2026
Second-Trimester Uterine Rupture After Conservative Myomectomy: A Case Report and Institutional Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine rupture following myomectomy represents a rare but severe complication of pregnancy, with a reported incidence of less than 1%. It most commonly occurs during the late second or third trimester and is associated with significant maternal hemorrhage and fetal compromise. We report the case of a 36-year-old G3P0 woman at 28 + 5 weeks of gestation with a history of prior laparoscopic myomectomy complicated by postoperative hemorrhage and sepsis, who presented with acute abdominal pain and hemodynamic instability. Emergency laparotomy revealed approximately 1000 mL hemoperitoneum and a 3 cm rupture of the posterior wall of the lower uterine segment. A live preterm neonate was delivered via cesarean section, followed by total hysterectomy due to extensive uterine pathology and ongoing hemorrhage. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the neonate required intensive care support. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for uterine rupture in pregnant patients with a history of uterine surgery and highlights the potential role of surgical technique and uterine wall reconstruction in determining subsequent scar integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.