ArticleCureus2026
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Low Birth Weight in Singleton Pregnancies in Vietnam.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study compared seven machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify the most effective model for predicting low birth weight (LBW) in singleton pregnancies. The primary goal was to develop a high-accuracy screening tool to support clinical decision-making and early intervention.
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among women delivering at the Women and Children Hospital of An Giang, Vietnam. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm, and data imbalance was addressed with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Seven ML algorithms - logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, artificial neural network, and XGBoost (Seattle, WA: University of Washington) - were trained using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret feature importance and explain the final model.
resultsAmong 1,838 women with singleton pregnancies (1,678 non-LBW and 160 LBW), the prevalence of LBW was 8.7% (95% CI: 7.5-10.0%). Of the seven ML models evaluated, the RF model achieved the highest overall performance, with an AUC of 0.778, an accuracy of 0.871, and a specificity of 0.909. LR demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.581). SHAP analysis of the RF model identified preterm birth as the most important predictor of LBW, followed by primiparity, absence of gestational diabetes, abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) findings, pre-eclampsia, and a prior history of LBW.
conclusionML-based prediction of LBW enables early identification of high-risk pregnancies and enables timely preventive strategies. In this study, the RF model demonstrated the best predictive performance, with key predictors including preterm birth, primiparity (first-born status), absence of gestational diabetes, abnormal CTG finding, pre-eclampsia, and prior history of LBW. Early identification combined with appropriate perinatal and neonatal care may reduce infant mortality and severe morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.