Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147525›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Pigtail Suprapubic Catheter Placement in a Patient With Acute Urinary Retention and Abdominal Mesh.

Clara Keum, Zamran Masih, James Espinosa, Alan Lucerna

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clara KeumEmergency Medicine, Jefferson Health New Jersey, Stratford, USA.
Zamran MasihEmergency Medicine, Jefferson Health New Jersey, Stratford, USA.
James EspinosaEmergency Medicine, Jefferson Health New Jersey, Stratford, USA.
Alan LucernaEmergency Medicine, Jefferson Health New Jersey, Stratford, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a urological emergency that requires immediate bladder decompression. When urethral catheterization is not feasible, suprapubic catheterization can be performed as an alternative. An 86-year-old male patient with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prior hernia repair with surgical mesh presented to the emergency department (ED) with AUR for 16 hours. Due to multiple false passages, a completely blind-ended bladder neck, and a 6 mm urethral stone, urethral catheterization was unsuccessful, prompting an attempt at suprapubic catheterization. However, suprapubic catheter placement was also unsuccessful due to the presence of surgical mesh from the previous hernia repair. Instead, an 8.5 Fr pigtail catheter was successfully placed using ultrasound guidance and the Seldinger technique, draining over 1 L of urine from the patient's bladder. The use of a smaller-diameter pigtail catheter offers multiple benefits when standard suprapubic catheter placement is not feasible due to anatomical or structural difficulties. It allows for urgent and effective bladder decompression, minimal training is required, and pigtail catheters are readily accessible. However, because smaller-diameter catheters are used, they may not effectively drain blood clots. Despite this limitation, their availability and effectiveness make them a viable alternative in the ED.

Indexed as

emergency department management of urinary retentionpigtail catheter use in urinary retentionsuprapubic catheter placementtreatment of acute urinary retentionurinary retention

Identifiers

PMID42147525
PMCPMC13179855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.