ArticleCureus2026
Pigtail Suprapubic Catheter Placement in a Patient With Acute Urinary Retention and Abdominal Mesh.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a urological emergency that requires immediate bladder decompression. When urethral catheterization is not feasible, suprapubic catheterization can be performed as an alternative. An 86-year-old male patient with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prior hernia repair with surgical mesh presented to the emergency department (ED) with AUR for 16 hours. Due to multiple false passages, a completely blind-ended bladder neck, and a 6 mm urethral stone, urethral catheterization was unsuccessful, prompting an attempt at suprapubic catheterization. However, suprapubic catheter placement was also unsuccessful due to the presence of surgical mesh from the previous hernia repair. Instead, an 8.5 Fr pigtail catheter was successfully placed using ultrasound guidance and the Seldinger technique, draining over 1 L of urine from the patient's bladder. The use of a smaller-diameter pigtail catheter offers multiple benefits when standard suprapubic catheter placement is not feasible due to anatomical or structural difficulties. It allows for urgent and effective bladder decompression, minimal training is required, and pigtail catheters are readily accessible. However, because smaller-diameter catheters are used, they may not effectively drain blood clots. Despite this limitation, their availability and effectiveness make them a viable alternative in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.