ArticleCureus2026
Regional Anesthesia Versus Systemic Analgesia in Thoracotomies for Congenital Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series in a Quaternary Care Children's Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives Limited studies have characterized differences in postoperative outcomes between regional anesthetic techniques with systemic analgesia and systemic analgesia alone in thoracotomies for congenital cardiac surgery. This retrospective case series aimed to assess the efficacy of regional anesthetic techniques in improving postoperative outcomes in children undergoing thoracotomies for cardiac surgery in comparison to children who only received systemic analgesia without any regional anesthesia. Methods Perioperative data from patients under 18 years of age who underwent thoracotomy for coarctation of the aorta or vascular ring repair between January 2017 and March 2022 in a single-center quaternary care children's hospital were collected, including the presence or absence of a regional or neuraxial anesthetic technique. Primary outcomes collected were 24-hour postoperative pain scores and 24-hour opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes collected were incidence of moderate pain, time to extubation, and block complications. Results One hundred and forty patients underwent thoracotomy for coarctation or vascular ring in the study period. Regional or neuraxial anesthesia (paravertebral, erector spinae plane, serratus anterior, or caudal opioid) was utilized in 62 (44.3%) cases. Paravertebral blocks were the most common block. Both groups demonstrated well-controlled pain throughout the first 24 hours. Twenty-four-hour opioid consumption (mg/kg of intravenous morphine equivalents (IME)) was similar between regional and non-regional groups (0.36 (0.20, 0.54) versus 0.39 (0.18, 0.62); p=0.48). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate pain between groups. Conclusions Pain was well-controlled in patients who received regional plus systemic analgesia as well as patients who received systemic analgesia alone, with no differences in pain scores, moderate pain, or opioid use between the patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.