Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147522›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Automated Detection of COVID-19 Using Machine Learning Analysis of White Blood Cell Flow Cytometry Images.

Akihiro E Hirosse, André R Backes, Renata S Woloszynek, Fabio F Neves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akihiro E HirosseDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, BRA.
André R BackesDepartment of Computing, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, BRA.
Renata S WoloszynekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, BRA.
Fabio F NevesDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is usually diagnosed by real-time polymerase chain reaction testing of nasopharyngeal swabs, but this approach may be associated with a prolonged time to diagnosis. Machine learning incorporating findings from standard laboratory tests may more rapidly identify individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, enabling early management and protection for healthcare staff.

methodsA machine learning model was developed to detect patients infected with COVID-19 using only white blood cell flow cytometry without using symptom or clinical history data. The model included images from 106 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 211 controls admitted to a university hospital with respiratory symptoms. A total of 17 texture-feature analysis methods were tested using three classifiers. Finally, the Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm was used to combine the best-performing models. The performance of the final model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-Score.

resultsUsing the five-fold cross-validation technique, the final model achieved an accuracy of 88.96% for diagnosing patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. It also had a sensitivity of 78.30%, a specificity of 94.31%, a precision of 87.83%, an F1-score of 0.83, and an AUROC of 0.86.

conclusionsThe final algorithm showed good diagnostic performance even when compared with models that included clinical, epidemiological, and other laboratory or ancillary test data. The use of cytometry images could represent a significant advance in the early diagnosis of COVID-19.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecell morphological datacell population datacovid-19flow cytometryhemogramimage processingmachine learningsars-cov-2

Identifiers

PMID42147522
PMCPMC13179521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.