ArticleCureus2026
Prognosis and Treatment Approach for Stage 1 Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation Lesions: A Case Series With Long-Term Follow-Up.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) accounts for approximately 10%-20% of all neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration and is classically classified into three stages, with stage 1 representing the earliest form of disease. Despite its clinical relevance, limited evidence exists on the long-term prognosis of treatment-naïve stage 1 RAP, particularly regarding recurrence patterns and the development of macular atrophy or fibrosis over extended follow-up. This retrospective case series evaluates outcomes in four patients diagnosed with stage 1 RAP using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography. All patients were planned to receive a loading regimen of three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, followed by monthly review for at least 24 months. The loading phase was modified according to findings at each visit. At every appointment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp examination, and OCT assessment of macular anatomy were performed, with recurrence defined as clinical and/or OCT evidence of exudative activity warranting re-treatment. Over the follow-up period, all four patients demonstrated stable or improved BCVA after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Two patients had no recurrences across 24 months, while two patients each experienced a single recurrence, occurring at seven months and 24 months, respectively. Importantly, no eyes developed macular atrophy or fibrotic scarring during the observation period, and visual acuity remained stable or improved in all cases. These findings support the concept that early identification and prompt treatment of stage 1 RAP may be associated with a low recurrence burden and a favourable anatomic course, potentially limiting progression to atrophy or fibrosis and preserving long-term vision. They also suggest that a personalised management strategy, combining an initial loading phase with close surveillance and re-treatment only upon recurrence, may be effective in carefully selected early-stage RAP patients and could reduce overall injection burden. Larger studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these preliminary observations and to better define stage-specific treatment strategies for RAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.