ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
An explainable ensemble machine learning framework for predicting cartilage biomechanical degradation from transcriptomic profiles: toward smart orthopedic device design.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on digital-twin-driven full life-cycle design and manufacturing of rehabilitation assistive devices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease characterized by progressive biomechanical deterioration of cartilage tissue. This study aims to develop an explainable ensemble machine learning model capable of predicting cartilage biomechanical deterioration from transcriptomic profiles and to present this model as a digital biomarker for intelligent orthopedic devices. Methods: Seven independent datasets (n = 203) obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were harmonized using the Joint ComBat algorithm. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis performed on the training cohort (n = 122) identified 93 significant genes. An ensemble model combining Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms was trained using these genes. The disease probability generated by the model was redefined as a continuous Cartilage Degradation Index (CDI). The model's performance and generalizability were tested on four independent validation cohorts including patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM, n = 44), chondrocytes subjected to Results: The ensemble model demonstrated a 5-fold cross-validation performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.960. Permutation testing (p < 0.001) and bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) (AUC: 0.900-0.996) confirmed the model's robustness. CDI modeled degradation across a biologically consistent spectrum: 0.03-0.09 in healthy cartilage, 0.30-0.42 in early-stage APM, and 0.79 in advanced-stage OA. CDI scores were significantly higher in cells exposed to abnormal mechanical stress (overstress) compared to the control group (0.60 vs. 0.52, AUC = 0.778). SHAP analysis highlighted COL15A1, CXCL14, CISH, FAP, and PIM2 as the most critical mechanosensitive genes. Pathway analysis confirmed that the model is based on mechanotransduction mechanisms such as focal adhesion, extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Conclusion: This study presents a transcriptomic CDI capable of measuring cartilage biomechanical degradation at the molecular level. The identified mechanosensitive gene profile holds strong potential as a digital biomarker for next-generation smart orthopedic implants and wearable biomechanical sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.