Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147478›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Renal Stone Clearance During Flexible Ureterorenoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Mohammad Al-Zubi, Mohammad Ghassab Deameh, Sara Marwan Ghanem, Rania Ahmad Abufarhan, Rhma Ra'afat Alrfooh, Balqees Odeh Alrfooh, Layan Ibrahim Kuran, Hala Ahmad Hazaimeh, Weaam Ali Aladamat, Yaseen Abdelqader Yaseen Asa'd and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammad Al-ZubiGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7160-9484
Mohammad Ghassab DeamehDepartment of Medicine Al-Balqa Applied University As-Salt Jordan.
Sara Marwan GhanemGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Rania Ahmad AbufarhanGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Rhma Ra'afat AlrfoohGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Balqees Odeh AlrfoohGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Layan Ibrahim KuranGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Hala Ahmad HazaimehGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Weaam Ali AladamatGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Yaseen Abdelqader Yaseen Asa'dDepartment of Medicine Hashemite University Zarqa Jordan.
Mohamad N M KharashgahGeneral Surgery and Anesthesia Department Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan.
Ghassan TalahmehDepartment of Urology Jordan Hospital Amman Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Urinary tract stones (kidney and ureter) are a common medical condition. Recently, advancements in minimally invasive endoscopic procedures have significantly transformed the surgical management of urolithiasis. Methods: The study enrolled 123 patients with kidney stones who underwent FURS with laser lithotripsy in the period between January 2021 and January 2023. The patients were divided into two groups, first one includes patients who underwent FURS with UAS and the second group include those who underwent FURS without UAS. The patients who underwent FURS with UAS and without UAS were compared based on operative time, complications, and stone-free rate. The patients underwent CT scan of the urinary tract after two to 4 weeks. Results: A total of 123 patients who underwent FURS with laser lithotripsy between January 2021 and January 2023 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among them, 58 patients (47%) underwent FURS with UAS, while 65 patients (53%) underwent FURS without UAS. The use of UAS is associated with a significant reduction in operative time and a higher stone-free rate compared to patients who underwent FURS without UAS. The complications were comparable between patients who underwent FURS with UAS and without UAS. Conclusion: The use of UAS is associated with a significant reduction in operative time and a higher stone-free rate compared to patients who underwent FURS without UAS.

Indexed as

flexible ureteroscopystone clearanceureteral access sheathurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID42147478
PMCPMC13176778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.