ReviewHealth science reports2026
Who Funds Research in Ghana? A Scoping Review of Published Articles in the Last Decade.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research and innovation are crucial drivers of economic and social development in any country. However, the sources and allocation of research funding can significantly impact the priorities, quality, and impact of the research conducted. This scoping review aims to map and characterize research funding sources in Ghana over the last decade. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Relevant studies published between January 2014 and March 2024 were included, and data on the funding sources for research projects in Ghana were extracted and analyzed. Results: The search identified 246 relevant studies. The research funding landscape in Ghana is characterized by diverse funding sources. Of the total included studies, the most frequently acknowledged funders were the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (4.4% of studies), the United States Agency for International Development (3.6%), and the National Institutes of Health (3.3%). Funding supported research across multiple sectors, including health, agriculture, education, environmental sustainability, and social development. Conclusion: The findings of this scoping review demonstrate that research funding in Ghana is multifaceted, with a mix of international, national, and local sources. However, the heavy reliance on international donors suggests a need for strengthened domestic funding mechanisms to ensure alignment with national priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.