ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Exploration of rehabilitation psychology in multidisciplinary care of upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries: patient and provider perspectives.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries pose long-term functional and psychological challenges, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach that integrates surgical, medical, and rehabilitative care. Rehabilitation psychologists play a critical role in addressing emotional distress and functional adaptation after injury, particularly as treatment decisions shape recovery expectations. This study examines how factors such as injury chronicity, mechanism, and surgical decisions impact patients' perception of the value of rehabilitation psychology (RP) intervention following peripheral nerve injury. RP intervention consisted of seeing a rehabilitation psychologist for mental health screening, as well as recommendations for further mental health related follow-up. Fifty consecutive patients with upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries who underwent consultation at a multidisciplinary peripheral nerve clinic completed a two-item survey to assess the perceived importance of RP before and after their clinic visit. Providers were asked to complete a five-question survey. Patients were grouped based on their perception of the value of following RP intervention, and predictors of improved perception were analyzed. Following intervention, 74% of patients demonstrated improved perception of RP or stayed at the highest possible score both pre- and post-visit, suggesting that RP was found to be a valuable addition to the PNI care team. No statistically significant associations were found between perception changes and clinical factors. These findings support the integration of RP in multidisciplinary peripheral nerve injury care, and further research should explore the long-term role of RP and applicability to other injury types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.