Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147434›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Exploration of rehabilitation psychology in multidisciplinary care of upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries: patient and provider perspectives.

Stephanie H Vu, Michael L Dolezal, Sonja Katt, JulieAnn Uh, Benjamin L Grannan, Sarah M Smith, Christopher S Crowe, Yusha Katie Liu, Jeffrey B Friedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie H VuDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Michael L DolezalDivision of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sonja KattDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
JulieAnn UhDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Benjamin L GrannanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sarah M SmithDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Christopher S CroweDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Yusha Katie LiuDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jeffrey B FriedrichDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries pose long-term functional and psychological challenges, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach that integrates surgical, medical, and rehabilitative care. Rehabilitation psychologists play a critical role in addressing emotional distress and functional adaptation after injury, particularly as treatment decisions shape recovery expectations. This study examines how factors such as injury chronicity, mechanism, and surgical decisions impact patients' perception of the value of rehabilitation psychology (RP) intervention following peripheral nerve injury. RP intervention consisted of seeing a rehabilitation psychologist for mental health screening, as well as recommendations for further mental health related follow-up. Fifty consecutive patients with upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries who underwent consultation at a multidisciplinary peripheral nerve clinic completed a two-item survey to assess the perceived importance of RP before and after their clinic visit. Providers were asked to complete a five-question survey. Patients were grouped based on their perception of the value of following RP intervention, and predictors of improved perception were analyzed. Following intervention, 74% of patients demonstrated improved perception of RP or stayed at the highest possible score both pre- and post-visit, suggesting that RP was found to be a valuable addition to the PNI care team. No statistically significant associations were found between perception changes and clinical factors. These findings support the integration of RP in multidisciplinary peripheral nerve injury care, and further research should explore the long-term role of RP and applicability to other injury types.

Indexed as

brachial plexus neuropathiesmultidisciplinary care teamnerve compressionperipheral nerve injuriesrehabilitation psychology

Identifiers

PMID42147434
PMCPMC13176204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.