ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Effects of early rehabilitation with a physiatrist and a registered therapist operating acute rehabilitation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prolonged immobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU) leads to ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), which delays ventilator liberation and worsens outcomes. Although early mobilization is beneficial, and the Physiatrist and Registered Therapist Operating Acute Rehabilitation (PROr) program has been associated with improved functional recovery and higher home-discharge rates in stroke populations, its effectiveness in mechanically ventilated ICU patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PROr in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective observational study from 2013 to 2017. Adults requiring mechanical ventilation with a pre-admission Barthel Index (BI) ≥ 70 were included. Patients were assigned to early mobilization (EM; within 48 h of ICU admission) or usual mobilization (UM; after 48 h). Primary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay. Secondary outcomes included neurological responsiveness and functional recovery at discharge. Results: Sixty-nine patients were analyzed (44 EM, 25 UM), with comparable baseline characteristics. EM was associated with shorter median ventilation duration (5.5 vs. 7.7 days; Conclusions: Mobilization within 48 h under the PROr did not induce any clinical adverse events and significantly reduced ventilation duration and the length of ICU stay. Mobilization of mechanically ventilated unconsciousness ICU patients may improve levels of consciousness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.