Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147426›Full record

ArticleBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Under-reporting of carcinoma in situ in patients with high-grade papillary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Adam Cole, Daniel A Shoskes, R Jonathan Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam ColePathNet, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Daniel A ShoskesFerring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
R Jonathan HendersonArkansas Urology, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) with high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma impacts patient risk stratification and treatment. However, on identification of a high-grade papillary lesion, pathologists may be disinclined to search for possible CIS. Several newer agents for bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are indicated specifically for patients with CIS ± papillary tumors; hence failure to detect/report CIS may limit treatment options. Objective: To assess CIS frequency in patients with high-grade Ta/T1 NMIBC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, transurethral resection of bladder tumor biopsy specimens with an accompanying diagnosis of high-grade papillary NMIBC without CIS were identified in the PathNet database (2023-2024) and re-reviewed by a single pathologist for the presence of concomitant CIS. Results: In total, 316 cases of high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (254 Ta, 62 T1 disease) were identified for re-review. Mean patient age was 73 (range 27-93) years; 81.0% of patients were male. On re-review, CIS was identified in 80 cases (25.3%, 95% CI 20.8%-30.4%). CIS frequency was higher in T1 disease (19/62 cases [30.6%]) Conclusion: This study suggests that ∼25% of patients with high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma may have unreported CIS. Close communication between the urologist and pathologist is crucial in ensuring specific exclusion of CIS in all bladder specimens, since a diagnosis of concomitant CIS may impact patient management.

Indexed as

bladder cancercarcinoma in situdiagnosisepidemiologypapillary urothelial carcinomapathology

Identifiers

PMID42147426
PMCPMC13173348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.