ArticleJournal of public health research2026
The assessing medical professionals' knowledge of autism spectrum disorders.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) continues to rise, underscoring the importance of assessing physicians' preparedness to recognize ASD symptoms promptly and provide appropriate care and support to affected children and their families. Objective: The aim was to assess the level of knowledge among medical professionals described above and involved in the care of children with ASD. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire in Kazakh and Russian. A total of 638 Almaty medical professionals participated: 312 general practitioners (GP), 194 pediatricians, 88 neurologists, and 44 psychiatrists. Analyses were performed in Stata 15.1, with GP and pediatrician data examined as primary healthcare (PHC) groups, and neurologists and psychiatrists analyzed as specialists from both PHC and inpatient settings. The questionnaire showed good internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson Formula 20: 0.842 for neurologists/psychiatrists; 0.854 for pediatricians/GPs). Tetrachoric correlations were used for factor extraction. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and principal factor analysis assessed relationships between professional characteristics and ASD knowledge. Results: Psychiatrists demonstrated a greater recognition of certain ASD signs and a stronger need for further education than neurologists, with key areas centered on social, behavioral, and sensory symptoms. Pediatricians with more experience than GPs, demonstrated a higher awareness of ASD symptoms and diagnosis, with social impairment and diagnostic knowledge being the main factors shaping understanding in both groups. Conclusion: The low awareness of physicians in providing care to children with ASD revealed the need to develop strategies to improve their knowledge, in particular among GPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.