ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2026
GLP-1 Agonist Use Is Not Associated With a Reduction of Paraspinal Muscle Quality in Diabetic Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The body-composition-modifying effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) remain incompletely characterized, particularly by direct measures of skeletal muscle beyond dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. This knowledge gap puts vulnerable populations at risk. Purpose: We sought to answer the following question: Is GLP-1 RA use associated with changes in muscle quality as defined by total muscle area, functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), and fatty infiltration (FI), and measured by serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) in the paraspinal musculature of diabetic patients with low back pain? Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study including patients with diabetes and low back pain with at least 2 imaging studies taken at least 3 months apart between 2014 and 2024. Total muscle area, fCSA, and FI were calculated for each patient in the bilateral psoas and posterior paraspinal muscles on T2-weighted axial MRIs. Normalized muscle change per year was calculated between scans for each patient (the difference between muscle measurement on the most recent and the baseline MRI, divided by the length of follow-up). Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, baseline body mass index, and sex examined the association of GLP-1 use and muscle changes per year. Results: We examined data on 38 patients on a GLP-1 RA (61% male, median age 67 years) and 128 patients on any other diabetes medication (54% male, median age 71 years). The average duration of treatment for the GLP-1 RA cohort was 21.7 ± 10.7 months, with baseline imaging predating treatment by an average of 10.4 ± 10.1 months. We observed no significant longitudinal differences in estimates of FI or fCSA in the psoas, erector spinae, or multifidus in GLP-1 users compared to controls. Conclusion: This retrospective single-institution study observed no statistically significant differences in changes in paraspinal muscle quality in patients with diabetes and low back pain taking a GLP-1 RA compared to controls. However, this preliminary study may have been underpowered to detect small to moderate effects. Further adequately powered, long-term studies are essential to establish the effects of GLP-1 RAs on muscle quality, especially research using standardized imaging metrics of body composition and muscle quality. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.