Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147405›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026

On the optimization of copy number variations representation in pangenome graphs.

Mirko Coggi, Lorenzo Basile, Beatrice Branchini, Gabriele Amodeo, Guido Walter Di Donato, Marco D Santambrogio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirko CoggiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo BasileDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Beatrice BranchiniDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele AmodeoDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Guido Walter Di DonatoGenoGra s.r.l., Milan, Italy.
Marco D SantambrogioDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph-based pangenome references often misrepresent Copy Number Variations (CNVs) and Variable Number Tandem Repeats (VNTRs) as alternative acyclic paths, which hinders downstream analyses, degrades alignment behavior, and reduces interpretability in graph visualizations. For these reasons, we introduce PANPHORTE, a topology-optimization methodology that detects repeat-driven misrepresentations within superbubbles and rewrites them into structures that more faithfully reflect the underlying biology. Given a pangenome graph annotated with haplotype paths, PANPHORTE identifies repetitive elements inside superbubbles, isolates shared repeat sequences across distinct subpaths, and refactors the graph by splitting nodes and introducing explicit cycles, encoding CNVs and VNTRs without loss of information. We provide a C++ command-line implementation of the proposed specifications, and a complementary pipeline that applies PANPHORTE followed by GFAffix to further reduce redundancy in regions not affected by repeat-induced artifacts. We evaluate PANPHORTE on synthetic and real pangenome graphs, showing reductions in memory footprint of up to 71.69%, improvements in exact read matches of up to 34.4%, and substantially clearer visual identification of repeated loci.

Indexed as

copy number variationsgenome graphsgenomicspangenomicstopology optimization

Identifiers

PMID42147405
PMCPMC13176207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.