ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
The evolution of radical prostatectomy: a scoping review on surgical techniques and integration of surgeon-assisting concepts into the surgical workflow.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radical prostatectomy remains a key curative treatment for localized prostate cancer which has undergone continuous transformation. Recent developments in robot-assisted and single-port surgery have followed the concept of minimizing morbidity while maintaining oncologic safety. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence and novel diagnostic tools have transformed the modern surgical workflow. Therefore, the aim of this study is to give an overview of the evolution of surgical techniques, functional and oncological outcomes, and available surgeon-assisting concepts. Methods: We conducted a non-structured review to summarize the evolution of radical prostatectomy techniques and recent developments in surgeon-assisting tools. Relevant English-language publications were identified through a targeted PubMed search using predefined keywords related to, laparoscopic, robot-assisted, Retzius-sparing, and single-port approaches. Key studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were used and synthesized to provide a comparative overview. Furthermore, studies focusing on integration of artificial intelligence, novel diagnostic tools and targeted surgery are discussed. Results: Laparoscopic surgery aims to reduce morbidity yet is technically demanding. Robotic-assisted approaches improve visualization and precision, leading to faster recovery and earlier continence recovery. Newer Retzius-sparing and single-port techniques show promising functional results, though evidence is still limited. Novel diagnostic tools including image overlay, targeted surgery, and fast and accurate intraoperative pathological assessment of resection margins are increasingly shaping modern radical prostatectomy. Conclusion: Radical prostatectomy has evolved into a minimally invasive, technology-driven procedure with improved recovery and functional outcomes. Advances in robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence enhance surgical precision. Ongoing innovation and long-term data will define the future of prostate surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.