ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2026
Development of an interpretable machine learning model for lymphovascular space invasion prediction in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: A prospective study.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is a high-risk factor for lymph node metastasis, relapse, and poor prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). However, the diagnosis of LVSI still relies on traditional pathological methods. Moreover, the high-risk factors and mechanism for LVSI remain unclear. Thus, this study developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to accurately predict LVSI status in patients with EEC. Methods: The study collected data from 832 patients with EEC at Peking University People's Hospital. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=582) and internal validation (n=250) cohorts. A prospective external validation cohort included 129 patients with EEC from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Using 21 parameters, 6 ML strategies were used to build prediction models. The global and local interpretation of feature significance was performed using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach. Data from NanoString nCounter evaluation was subjected to pathway enrichment and Spearman correlation analysis to investigate the mechanistic basis of LVSI. Results: Among the six ML models, the XGBoost model had the best performance. The XGBoost model correctly predicted the risk of LVSI in the training set [area under the curve (AUC): 0.982, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.972-0.991], the internal validation set (AUC: 0.818, 95% CI: 0.776-0.860), and the external test set (AUC: 0.748, 95% CI: 0.618-0.879). The calibration curve indicated that the XGBoost model exhibited favorable consistency between the predicted and actual risks. SHAP analysis identified age, carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and neutrophil as the top four variables contributing to XGBoost model predictions. Analysis of NanoString data indicated that LVSI may be closely associated with the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Conclusions: We developed an interpretable ML model for preoperative LVSI risk prediction in patients with EEC. This model may aid clinicians by informing individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.