ReviewEcancermedicalscience2026
Brachytherapy reirradiation for local recurrences of gynaecological cancers: two clinical cases, literature review and OAR constraints.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Local recurrence of gynaecological malignancies after prior pelvic radiotherapy presents a complex therapeutic dilemma. Pelvic exenteration is curative in select cases but carries high morbidity and profound quality-of-life impact. Salvage reirradiation with image-guided brachytherapy (BT) offers a highly conformal alternative; however, data remain fragmented and practical organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints are not standardised. Objectives: 1) To describe in detail two contemporary cases of high-dose-rate (HDR) BT reirradiation - one vulvar and one vaginal vault recurrence - highlighting planning strategy, catheter implantation, dosimetry and clinical outcome; 2) to synthesise current evidence on efficacy, toxicity, dose-fractionation and technique of BT reirradiation in cervical, endometrial and vulvar cancers; and 3) to propose pragmatic cumulative EQD2 OAR limits for rectum, bladder, small bowel and urethra based on published series. Methods: Both patients underwent computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring with hybrid interstitial or surface mould applicators. Total doses were 45.6 Gy in 8 fractions (EQD210 ≈ 60 Gy) for the vulvar recurrence and 24.6 Gy in 3 fractions (EQD24.5 ≈ 48 Gy) for the vaginal vault recurrence, with cumulative OAR doses referenced against literature-derived thresholds. A narrative review (1993-2024) identified 35 key studies involving >600 reirradiated patients. Results: The vulvar case achieved complete response at 6 months without Grade ≥3 toxicity; the vaginal vault case showed initial partial response, remained ECOG 0 and required systemic therapy for later progression. Across the literature, 1- to 3-year local control ranged 40%-80% and overall survival 40%-60%, with severe late toxicity generally ≤30% when cumulative doses respected D2cc ≈ 70-100 Gy3 (rectum), 90-120 Gy3 (bladder) and D0.5cc ≤ 110 Gy3(urethra). Fractionation of 4-6 Gy BID for 5-10 fractions (EQD210 ≈ 40-50 Gy) was most common. Conclusion: HDR BT reirradiation can achieve meaningful, sometimes durable, local control in carefully selected gynaecologic-cancer recurrences while preserving pelvic organs. Adhering to proposed cumulative EQD2 OAR constraints and employing image-guided interstitial techniques are paramount to curtail severe complications. Multidisciplinary assessment and treatment at experienced centres are strongly recommended to optimise outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.