ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Natural supplements in breast cancer therapy: translational evidence, clinical safety, and emerging challenges.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer are increasing, although improvements in traditional treatments, and it remains the most frequent cancer among women globally. The increasing demand for natural supplements and other forms of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) shows that people are becoming increasingly intrigued by more comprehensive methods of health care that aim to improve people's well-being as well as their ability to recover from illness. The objective of this review article is to focus on the clinical safety features supported by data and the translational utility of the natural supplements such as vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals against breast cancer. Anticancer activity by antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, apoptotic inductors, and hormonal modulators characterize the behaviour of such natural compounds as curcumin, withaferin A, luteolin, quercetin, and resveratrol. Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies suggest that certain natural supplements may modulate therapeutic response and influence treatment-related toxicity; however, robust clinical evidence remains limited, and definitive conclusions regarding efficacy require further well-designed randomized trials Indeed, the lack of bioavailability, standardization, and the risk of herb-drug interaction prevent these agents from becoming the prevailing therapy option. However, several well-functioning strategies that promote the development of nanotechnology-based formulations and corresponding optimal doses appear to be promising. Even though the regular administration of natural supplements can have significant potential within breast cancer management, the process should be consistent with the principles of evidence-based practice. At the same time, there is the need for clinical trials focused on the development of corresponding pharmacovigilance systems and closer interdisciplinary collaboration. Importantly, future studies are expected to make special emphasis on such factors as dosing personalization, standardization parameters, and their integration with precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.