ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Equity and representation in oncology clinical evidence for FDA-approved treatments and the impact of COVID-19.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pivotal clinical trials form the evidentiary foundation for FDA oncology drug approvals, yet persistent disparities in participant demographics may limit the generalizability and equity of cancer care. This study aimed to quantify demographic disparities in pivotal trials that supported FDA oncology drug approvals, and to identify trial-level characteristics associated with the underrepresentation of women, racial and ethnic minorities, and older adults. We also assessed the impact of COVID-19 on participant representation. Methods: We systematically identified pivotal trials supporting FDA oncology drug approvals from January 2018 through November 2024 using the FDA Hematology/Oncology Approvals database. Demographic data were extracted for gender, race, ethnicity, and age. SEER 21 data were used to derive population-based estimates. Enrollment incidence ratios (EIRs) were calculated for gender, race, ethnicity, and older adults (EIR <1 indicating underrepresentation). Meta-regression was used to evaluate temporal trends and associations between trial characteristics and representation disparities. Subgroup analyses were conducted for pediatric trials, accelerated approvals, and other trial-level factors. Results: Among 329 included trials enrolling over 164,000 participants, women, older adults, Black, and Hispanic individuals were consistently underrepresented. Pooled EIRs indicated significant underrepresentation of female (EIR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88), Black (EIR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.22-0.30), Hispanic (EIR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.44-0.57), and older participants (EIR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89). Meta-regression showed modest gains in female representation over time (β=0.02, p=0.03), but no significant improvement for Black or Hispanic participants. Older adult representation declined slightly. Trial-level factors associated with underrepresentation included industry sponsorship, use of overall survival as the primary endpoint, and accelerated approval designation. Pandemic-period EIRs were largely similar to non-pandemic EIRs, with lower representation for older adults and White participants. Conclusions: Despite recent regulatory efforts, demographic disparities persist in pivotal oncology trials supporting FDA approvals. Female, Black, Hispanic, and older adults remain underrepresented, limiting the applicability of trial findings to real-world cancer populations. Greater efforts are needed to design inclusive trials, enforce diversity mandates, and ensure equitable evidence generation in oncology drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.