ArticleResearch square2026
The Gut Microbiome Profile of Lions in Etosha National Park, Namibia.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in carnivore ecology, diet, and health, yet remains poorly characterised in African lions ( Results: We present the first comprehensive gut microbiome analysis of free-living African lions, including novel MAGs generated from examining 23 fresh faecal samples from 20 individuals in Etosha National Park, Namibia. The African lion gut was dominated by Bacteroides (22.1%) and Phocaeicola (13.3%) - two related genera - contrasting sharply with the captive lions where Fusobacterium (Bhopal, India) and Firmicutes (Rotterdam, Netherlands) predominate. This divergence likely reflects dietary differences, captivity effects and possibly allopatric separation. While recent work has begun to characterise taxonomic composition in wild African lions, our study extends these findings through the reconstruction of 318 bacterial and 102 viral metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from combined short- and long-read sequencing data. Most MAGs shared <95% average nucleotide identity with existing reference genomes, indicating largely novel species. Supplementing the GTDB database with these MAGs reduced unclassified reads from 24.5% to 9.2%, demonstrating the substantial gaps in existing carnivore gut microbiome databases. Functional analysis revealed metabolic pathway enrichment, particularly for purine metabolism-critical for processing the lions' high-purine diet-with nearly complete pathways for degrading adenine and guanine to urea. Conclusions: This study provides the first in depth description of the microbial taxa in the African lion gut microbiome. Genera in the Bacteroidaceae family dominated. There are large differences with the metagenomics of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.