ArticleResearch square2026
Helping Peer Specialists Succeed: Lessons from a Statewide Training Program.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine factors related to successful completion of peer support specialist training and certification. Methods: This study analyzed enrollment data to study graduation outcomes in 1,164 participants in the Certified Recovery Support Specialist (CRSS) Success Program, an intervention designed to scale up the number of peer specialists in the state by funding tuition and direct supports for students. Exploratory institutional-level binomial regression and grant funding data was used to understand the relationship between funding and graduation rate. Post-graduation survey data from 171 participants was also analyzed with logistic regression to understand factors associated with attempting and passing the peer specialist certification exam. Results: Receiving financial support beyond tuition and receiving academic accommodations were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of graduation, while requiring service supports like counseling or legal assistance decreased this likelihood. Working as a peer specialist during training also significantly boosted the probability of graduation, whereas taking a leave of absence did the opposite. Among graduates, receiving tangible support during their training and having a smaller gap between graduation and attempting the exam were associated with attempting and passing the exam, respectively. Conclusions: Direct supports for students are associated with successful progression through the peer specialist training pipeline. Workforce development programs like the CRSS Success Program can further optimize outcomes by providing additional supports, especially to students at-risk of attrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.