ArticleResearch square2026
Evolution of resources and study of factors associated with the quality of care for epidemic-prone diseases in Guinea.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the evolution of resources and to identify the factors associated with the quality of care for epidemic-prone diseases in Guinea. Method: A descriptive cross-sectional study focused on the management systems for epidemic-prone diseases in Guinea. Data were collected using structured questionnaires. The analysis of factors associated with the quality of care was conducted using logistic regression. Results: The evolution of management systems varied across regions. Overall, at the national level, before the Ebola outbreak, the evolution of management systems was low, with an overall score of 12%. During the Ebola virus crisis, the evolution of the systems was average, reaching 73%, and after the outbreak, it remained average at 77%. The quality of care was predominantly rated as good, accounting for 62.5%. The main factors associated with better quality of care included the presence of a patient diagnostic mechanism (aOR = 8; 95% CI [2.02-19.45]; p = 0.000), the availability of treatment protocols (aOR = 9.44; 95% CI [1.02-12.02]; p = 0.000), the presence of isolation sites (aOR = 4.23; 95% CI [1.61-9.66]; p = 0.000), the coordination of care (aOR = 8.5; 95% CI [1.22-12.00]; p = 0.002), and the availability of care teams (aOR = 8.5; 95% CI [1.22-12.00]; p = 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights significant progress in resources for the management of epidemic-prone diseases in Guinea during and after the Ebola crisis. Key factors such as diagnostic tools, treatment protocols, the availability of isolation sites, care coordination, and the presence of care teams were essential for success. The overall improvement reflects strengthened capacity and preparedness in Guinea, although challenges remain, particularly in terms of financial resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.