ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology2026
Clinical Associations of Osteoporosis in BCR::ABL1 Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Article in International journal of endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Associations of Osteoporosis in BCR::ABL1 Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Osteoporosis can be seen in some hematologic diseases, such as BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. The incidence and prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in BCR::ABL1-negative MPN are not very well known. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with one of the classical BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, such as essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis, were included in the study. Due to the retrospective design, a matched control group was not available, and comparisons with the general population were made for contextual interpretation. Results: Ninety-four patients were included. Fifty-eight (61.7%) patients had osteopenia, and 16 (17%) patients had osteoporosis according to femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements. Fifty-three (58.9%) patients had osteopenia, and 27 (30%) patients had osteoporosis according to lumbar DXA measurements. When both femur and lumbar DXA measurements were evaluated together, 67 (71.3%) patients had osteopenia and 31 (33%) patients had osteoporosis. In patients over 50 years of age, these frequencies were found to be 71.4% for osteopenia and 37.7% for osteoporosis. Osteopenia was significantly associated with female sex, cytoreduction, and longer disease duration ( Conclusion: Patients with BCR::ABL1-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms have a higher risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis compared to the general population. DXA measurements should be performed, especially in female patients and in patients of advanced age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.