Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147048›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Context-tuned strategies for marker selection precision in neuronal studies.

D Chanuka M Kulatunga, Min Kyu Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D Chanuka M KulatungaDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Min Kyu KimDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marker selection precision in neuronal studies is critical for reliable neuron identification. However, it largely depends on the experimental context. Variations in neuronal marker specificity across experimental models, neuronal maturation stages, and neurotransmitter phenotypes have highlighted the vitality of implementing "context-tuned" strategies in marker selection. Neuronal markers arise from canonical protein-coding genes, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), isoform-specific variants, neurotransmitters, and numerous metabolic signatures. Here, we emphasize protein-coding genes as markers because of their wide availability, ease of interpretation, and compatibility with standard detection methods like qPCR,

Indexed as

experimental modelsmarker specificityneuronal markerneuronal maturationneuron identificationneurotransmitter phenotype

Identifiers

PMID42147048
PMCPMC13176299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.