ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Flood hazard assessment and zonal prioritization through an LR-bipolar triangular fuzzy hybrid decision-making approach.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Flood risk assessment has become increasingly important in regions vulnerable to climate-induced disasters. This study addresses the need for a robust decision-support framework by proposing a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to prioritize flood-prone zones in the Ernakulam district of Kerala, aligning with sustainable development goals focused on climate resilience. Methods: The proposed approach employs LR-bipolar triangular fuzzy numbers (LRBTFNs) to effectively capture uncertainty in decision-making. It integrates three well-established MCDM techniques, Preference Selection Index (PSI), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), and Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS), to ensure a balanced and comprehensive ranking process. The methodology incorporates normalization, aggregation, and defuzzification steps to compute performance scores. Additionally, unsupervised learning techniques, namely K-means clustering and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), are utilized to validate vulnerability patterns and group regional profiles. Results and discussion: The results reveal that Kochi, Vypen, and Paravoor are the most vulnerable flood-prone zones, while Kothamangalam is identified as the least susceptible area. The integration of multiple MCDM methods enhances the robustness and reliability of the ranking outcomes, and clustering and PCA analyses further confirm consistent vulnerability trends across regions. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and local authorities to implement targeted risk mitigation and planning strategies. Moreover, the study supports Sustainable Development Goal 13 (Climate Action) by promoting resilience and preparedness against climate-induced flood hazards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.