Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146940›Full record

ArticleCase reports in medicine2026

Giant Cutaneous Horn of the Cheek: A Case Report.

Thuc Xuan Nguyen, Khoi Minh Khuat, Hai Thanh Pham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thuc Xuan NguyenFaculty of Dentistry, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, Vietnam, hpmu.edu.vn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1674-0564
Khoi Minh KhuatFaculty of Dentistry, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, Vietnam, hpmu.edu.vn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1005-6978
Hai Thanh PhamFaculty of Dentistry, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, Vietnam, hpmu.edu.vn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-9346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cutaneous horn is an uncommon lesion characterized by excessive keratinization, which protrudes above the skin surface and predominantly occurs on sun-exposed areas. Currently, the exact incidence and prevalence of this disease are not well-documented in the literature. An 83-year-old female patient presented with a cutaneous lesion in the left cheek for more than 15 years. Physical examination revealed the lesion size approximately accounted for 4 cm in length and 1.5 cm in diameter at the base, with a firm, nonerythematous, and painless swelling at its base. The lesion exhibited a distinctive appearance, resembling a large rooster's spur. Ultrasonographic record identified no definite evidence of deep subcutaneous invasion. To establish a definitive diagnosis, a preoperative biopsy was conducted, which histologically demonstrated a combination of squamous epithelial cells and keratinized debris. Treatment involved local anesthesia and surgical excision therapy. Postoperative management included the administration of antibiotics, NSAIDs for pain relief, and anti-inflammatory medications. The wound demonstrated favorable healing progress by the first postoperative day. The effective management of cutaneous horn necessitates a comprehensive approach involving precise diagnostic evaluation, proficient surgical excision, and diligent postoperative follow-up. This case study enhances the current understanding of this uncommon condition and underscores its implications for improving clinical outcomes and patient care.

Indexed as

cutaneous horndelayed treatmentsurgical excision

Identifiers

PMID42146940
PMCPMC13176616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.