ArticleCase reports in medicine2026
Giant Cutaneous Horn of the Cheek: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Giant Cutaneous Horn of the Cheek: A Case Report.Case reports in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cutaneous horn is an uncommon lesion characterized by excessive keratinization, which protrudes above the skin surface and predominantly occurs on sun-exposed areas. Currently, the exact incidence and prevalence of this disease are not well-documented in the literature. An 83-year-old female patient presented with a cutaneous lesion in the left cheek for more than 15 years. Physical examination revealed the lesion size approximately accounted for 4 cm in length and 1.5 cm in diameter at the base, with a firm, nonerythematous, and painless swelling at its base. The lesion exhibited a distinctive appearance, resembling a large rooster's spur. Ultrasonographic record identified no definite evidence of deep subcutaneous invasion. To establish a definitive diagnosis, a preoperative biopsy was conducted, which histologically demonstrated a combination of squamous epithelial cells and keratinized debris. Treatment involved local anesthesia and surgical excision therapy. Postoperative management included the administration of antibiotics, NSAIDs for pain relief, and anti-inflammatory medications. The wound demonstrated favorable healing progress by the first postoperative day. The effective management of cutaneous horn necessitates a comprehensive approach involving precise diagnostic evaluation, proficient surgical excision, and diligent postoperative follow-up. This case study enhances the current understanding of this uncommon condition and underscores its implications for improving clinical outcomes and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.