Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Congenital urinary tract dilation: when is it clinically significant and when should it prompt intervention?

Gunes Isik, Cemil Oktay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gunes IsikPediatric Nephrology, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkiye.
Cemil OktayRadiology, Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract dilation is the most common urinary tract anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasonography. Postnatal follow-up, the necessity of advanced imaging, and indications for surgical intervention remain confusing and subject to ongoing debate. Objectives: Our aim is to evaluate the etiology, clinical and radiological characteristics of congenital urinary tract dilation, and assess the timing and outcomes of spontaneous resolution, advanced imaging, surgical interventions, and postoperative follow-up. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the etiology, clinical and radiological features, and outcomes of congenital urinary tract dilation in children at Adiyaman University Pediatric Nephrology Clinic between November 2021 and 2023. Urinary tract dilation was classified by ultrasonographic anteroposterior (AP) diameter on postnatal urinary system ultrasonography as normal (<10 mm), mild-moderate (10-15 mm), or severe (>15 mm). Results: Among 341 patients (71.3% male), 36.2% had severe and 63.8% had mild-to-moderate urinary tract dilation. Mean AP diameter was 14.4 ± 7.0 mm. Urinary tract dilation resolved in 96.2% of patients, typically within 3-44 months (mean 11 ± 6.3). Surgery was required in 22.6% of patients, mostly for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux, and was significantly more common in severe cases (56.1% vs. 3.7%, Conclusion: An AP diameter ≥17 mm, decreased differential kidney function, UTI history, and family history of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract are strong indicators for surgical intervention.

Indexed as

childrenclinical prognostic factorscongenital urinary tract dilationsurgeryultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42146925
PMCPMC13171823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.