Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146873›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2026

AI in Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review of Multimodal Models Combining Pathology Images and High-Throughput Omics.

Charlotte Jennings, Andrew Broad, Lucy Godson, Emily Clarke, David Westhead, Darren Treanor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte JenningsNational Pathology Imaging Cooperative, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-4057
Andrew BroadNational Pathology Imaging Cooperative, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-6860
Lucy GodsonNational Pathology Imaging Cooperative, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3419-7628
Emily ClarkeNational Pathology Imaging Cooperative, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-9898
David WestheadUniversity of Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-3820
Darren TreanorNational Pathology Imaging Cooperative, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-484X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study systematically reviews and evaluates published research on machine learning models that integrate histopathology whole slide images and high-throughput -omic data to predict overall survival in cancer. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted through August 12, 2024, with citation screening for additional studies. Eligible studies applied machine learning or deep learning methods to multimodal data combining pathology images and -omics. Data extraction followed the CHARMS checklist, and risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST + AI tool. Narrative synthesis was conducted in line with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Forty-eight studies published since 2017 met inclusion criteria, spanning 19 cancer types. All relied on The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Modelling approaches included regularised Cox regression (n = 4), classical machine learning (n = 13), and deep learning (n = 31). Reported concordance indices ranged from 0.550 to 0.857, with most multimodal models outperforming unimodal counterparts. However, all studies were assessed as having high or unclear risk of bias-most often due to limited external validation, insufficient reporting, and minimal assessment of clinical utility. This review highlights a rapidly evolving yet methodologically underdeveloped field. While model performance is promising, improvements in data standardisation, reporting practices, and real-world contextualisation are critical for clinical translation. This work was funded by the National Pathology Imaging Cooperative (NPIC), supported by UK Research and Innovation (Project no. 104687).

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancerclinical utilitydeep learninghistopathologymultimodal machine learningomicsprognostic modelsreporting standardssurvival predictionsystematic reviewwhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID42146873
PMCPMC13172687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.