ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Applications of artificial intelligence and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction: a systematic review.
Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current hypertension guidelines focus on blood pressure control, but incorporating end-organ imaging could improve understanding of disease manifestations. We undertook a systematic review to evaluate current task-level applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases up to end of December 2025. Retrieved studies were grouped by AI task, and a thematic qualitative analysis per-task was conducted to evaluate organ-specific findings, AI methodologies, and research gaps. For quantitative synthesis, the I2 statistic derived from Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity, and forest plots were generated to visualize effect sizes. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023427430). The search strategy yielded 48 studies. Thematic analysis categorized the studies into five major tasks, with the majority employing supervised learning for classification processes. Nearly half of the studies focused on the heart. However, paucity of studies performed multi-organ assessment, external validation, and phenotyping or predicting future risk. AI and computational approaches in imaging achieved an overall sensitivity of 0.84 [0.69-0.93] in identifying hypertension from normotension, highest with brain imaging. Sensitivity reached 0.92 [0.90-0.94] in discriminating hypertension from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Current research focusses primarily on hypertension prediction using single organ information. While results are promising, datasets remain small with limited external validation. There remains a need for discovery-oriented research to uncover disease heterogeneity, multi-organ phenotypes, and support personalized and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.