Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146867›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Applications of artificial intelligence and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction: a systematic review.

Mohanad Alkhodari, Prenali D Sattwika, Hannah R Cutler, George Milner, Turkay Kart, Leontios J Hadjileontiadis, Ahsan H Khandoker, Adam J Lewandowski, Winok Lapidaire, Abhirup Banerjee and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohanad AlkhodariCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-6327
Prenali D SattwikaCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-9958
Hannah R CutlerCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-4144
George MilnerCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Turkay KartCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-4990
Leontios J HadjileontiadisHealthcare Engineering Innovation Group (HEIG), Department of Biomedical Engineering & Biotechnology, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-9302
Ahsan H KhandokerHealthcare Engineering Innovation Group (HEIG), Department of Biomedical Engineering & Biotechnology, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-1646
Adam J LewandowskiNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-8965
Winok LapidaireCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-0735
Abhirup BanerjeeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-5128
Paul LeesonCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility (CCRF), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-9297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current hypertension guidelines focus on blood pressure control, but incorporating end-organ imaging could improve understanding of disease manifestations. We undertook a systematic review to evaluate current task-level applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and computational approaches to imaging for hypertension identification, phenotyping, and outcome prediction. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases up to end of December 2025. Retrieved studies were grouped by AI task, and a thematic qualitative analysis per-task was conducted to evaluate organ-specific findings, AI methodologies, and research gaps. For quantitative synthesis, the I2 statistic derived from Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity, and forest plots were generated to visualize effect sizes. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023427430). The search strategy yielded 48 studies. Thematic analysis categorized the studies into five major tasks, with the majority employing supervised learning for classification processes. Nearly half of the studies focused on the heart. However, paucity of studies performed multi-organ assessment, external validation, and phenotyping or predicting future risk. AI and computational approaches in imaging achieved an overall sensitivity of 0.84 [0.69-0.93] in identifying hypertension from normotension, highest with brain imaging. Sensitivity reached 0.92 [0.90-0.94] in discriminating hypertension from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Current research focusses primarily on hypertension prediction using single organ information. While results are promising, datasets remain small with limited external validation. There remains a need for discovery-oriented research to uncover disease heterogeneity, multi-organ phenotypes, and support personalized and targeted interventions.

Indexed as

Computational machine learningHypertensionMedical imagingOrgan damageSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42146867
PMCPMC13175042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.