ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
First Successful Regeneration of a Structurally Native-Like Colon Using a Bioabsorbable Polymer Sheet.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First Successful Regeneration of a Structurally Native-Like Colon Using a Bioabsorbable Polymer Sheet.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: In cases of colonic perforation, closure of the defect is the least invasive treatment; however, no dedicated tool has been developed for this purpose, and many cases require stoma creation. This study investigated whether a bioabsorbable polymer sheet (BAPS) can effectively close colonic perforation and induce colonic regeneration at the defect site. Methods: Ten mixed-breed pigs were used. An artificial colon was created using a BAPS composed of a copolymer reinforced with polyglycolic acid fibers. A circular 2-cm defect was created on the anterior sigmoid colon wall, and the BAPS was patched over the defect. Blood sampling and body weight assessments were performed at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after transplantation. Furthermore, the transplanted site was excised for macroscopic and histological evaluation at 4 and 8 weeks. Results: All pigs survived without complications. White blood cell counts exhibited a transient increase at 1 week but normalized rapidly. Body weight increased consistently. At 4 weeks, the BAPS was no longer observed at the transplanted site, and ulcer formation was noted. Histologically, several immature cells accumulated on the epithelial surface. At 8 weeks, the ulcers had reduced in size, and the site was indistinguishable from the surrounding tissue. Histological examination revealed regenerated mucosa and muscularis mucosae resembling native colonic tissue with partial smooth muscle regeneration. The size of the transplanted site was reduced by approximately 26%. Conclusions: The findings suggest that a BAPS can successfully close colonic perforations and regenerate colonic tissue at the defect site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.