Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146814›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Impact of Two-Team Surgery on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Nobuaki Hoshino, Koya Hida, Yukinari Tokoro, Kazutaka Obama, Takeru Matsuda, Ichiro Takemasa, Tomonori Akagi, Masafumi Inomata, Shigenori Homma, Nobuki Ichikawa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nobuaki HoshinoDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-8971
Koya HidaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-7075
Yukinari TokoroDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Kazutaka ObamaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-6701
Takeru MatsudaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-856X
Ichiro TakemasaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Medical and Science Center Osaka Keisatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Tomonori AkagiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University Oita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0722-0343
Masafumi InomataDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University Oita Japan.
Shigenori HommaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Nobuki IchikawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0241
Seiichiro YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9879-1239
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-6334
Ta‐Ta‐Mi study group collaboratives in Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Minimally invasive total mesorectal excision is widely used in rectal cancer surgery because of its better surgical field-of-view and recognition of microanatomy, compared with open surgery; however, it remains difficult to perform deep pelvic manipulation. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is expected to overcome these difficulties, especially in two-team surgeries with simultaneous abdominal and transanal approaches. Methods: Data were collected from patients with rectal cancer who underwent TaTME between January 2012 and December 2019 at 26 specialized rectal cancer institutions in Japan. Patients in the two-team surgery group were propensity score-matched in a 2:1 ratio to those in the one-team surgery group. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, transanal approach-related outcomes, and survival rates were compared between the two surgical groups. Results: Overall, 444 patients (296 and 148 in the two- and one-team surgery groups, respectively) were included in the analyses. The median operation time was significantly shorter ( Conclusion: Two-team surgery has advantages of shorter operation time, decreased estimated blood loss, increased number of lymph nodes dissected and decreased positive distal margin rates and potential to decrease recurrence rates.

Indexed as

prognosisrectal cancertransanal total mesorectal excisiontwo‐team surgery

Identifiers

PMID42146814
PMCPMC13178278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.