Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146773›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Exploring robot-led activities between people living with dementia and family care partners.

Jirachaya Fern Limprayoon, Debasmita Ghose, Kayla Matheus, Paula V Enriquez, Michal A Lewkowicz, Moon Hwan Kim, Austin Narcomey, Natnaree Proud Ua-Arak, Andy Cheng, Chayan Sarkar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jirachaya Fern LimprayoonSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Debasmita GhoseSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Kayla MatheusSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Paula V EnriquezSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Michal A LewkowiczSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Moon Hwan KimSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Austin NarcomeySocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Natnaree Proud Ua-ArakSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Andy ChengSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Chayan SarkarSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Joan K MoninSocial Gerontology and Health Lab, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Brian ScassellatiSocial Robotics Lab, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While shared activities foster connection between people living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners, emotional distress and daily caregiving responsibilities often make them difficult to initiate. This paper investigates the adaptation of a socially assistive robot, Ommie, to guide shared deep breathing and singing activities for these pairs. Methods: We refined the robot's behaviors through two interaction design sessions with people living with dementia and care partners, mediated by an occupational therapist. In a subsequent study with 17 pairs, participants engaged in deep breathing and singing activities with the robot as well as in-session semi-structured interviews, and we conducted post-hoc video analysis to explore their interactional dynamics. Results: Participants reported the interactions as easy to follow, calming, and familiar. Post-hoc video analysis revealed patterns of intimacy and synchrony, including frequent physical touch, mutual gaze, and rhythmic coordination. We also observed instances of personal memory recall and a playful atmosphere, in which pairs often used humor as a coping mechanism after deviations from the robot's instructions. Discussion: From our observations, we discuss three design opportunity spaces: the robot as the focus for synchronization, as an instrument of joint play, and as a source of familiarity versus variety.

Indexed as

care partner supportdementiajoint activitiessocial influencesocially assistive robots

Identifiers

PMID42146773
PMCPMC13172625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.