ArticleJAMIA open2026
OEMA: ontology-enhanced multi-agent collaboration framework for zero-shot clinical named entity recognition.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: With the rapid growth of unstructured clinical narratives in electronic health records (EHRs), clinical named entity recognition (NER) has become a crucial technique for extracting structured medical information. However, traditional supervised models such as CRF and BioClinicalBERT rely on costly manual annotations. Although large language model (LLM)-based zero-shot NER reduces the dependency on labeled data, challenges remain in aligning example selection with task granularity and in effectively integrating prompt design with self-improvement frameworks. Materials and Methods: To address these limitations, we propose OEMA, a novel zero-shot clinical NER framework based on ontology-enhanced multi-agent collaboration. OEMA consists of three core components: (1) a self-annotator that autonomously generates candidate examples; (2) a discriminator that leverages SNOMED CT to filter token-level examples based on clinical relevance; and (3) a predictor that incorporates entity-type descriptions to enhance inference consistency and accuracy. Results: Experimental results on three benchmark datasets, including the real-world I2B2 2010 dataset alongside MTSamples and VAERS, demonstrate that OEMA consistently outperforms existing zero-shot baselines under exact-match evaluation across multiple backbone LLMs (including gpt-3.5, gpt-4.1, and gemini-2.5-flash). Moreover, under relaxed-match criteria, OEMA performs comparably to the supervised BioClinicalBERT model while significantly outperforming the traditional CRF method. Discussion: OEMA integrates ontology-guided reasoning with multi-agent collaboration to address two key challenges in zero-shot clinical NER: granularity mismatch and prompt-self-improvement integration. Ablation studies indicate that ontology-based filtering reduces noise and improves semantic alignment, helping to bridge the style gap between synthetic data and real-world clinical narratives. Conclusion: OEMA advances zero-shot clinical NER and achieves performance approaching supervised models under relaxed-match criteria. Future work will focus on continual learning, open-domain adaptation, negation and assertion status detection, and multilingual generalization to further expand its applicability in clinical NLP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.