Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146716›Full record

ArticleSegmentation, classification, and synthesis for brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries : MICCAI 2025 Challenges: BraTS-Lighthouse 2025 and AIMS-TBI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025,...2026

Improving Pre-trained Adult Glioma Segmentation Models using only Post-processing Techniques.

Abhijeet Parida, Daniel Capellán-Martín, Zhifan Jiang, Nishad Kulkarni, Krithika Iyer, Austin Tapp, Syed Muhammad Anwar, María J Ledesma-Carbayo, Marius George Linguraru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Segmentation, classification, and synthesis for brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries : MICCAI 2025 Challenges: BraTS-Lighthouse 2025 and AIMS-TBI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025,..., 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abhijeet ParidaSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel Capellán-MartínSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Zhifan JiangSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Nishad KulkarniSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Krithika IyerSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Austin TappSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Syed Muhammad AnwarSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
María J Ledesma-CarbayoUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
Marius George LinguraruSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Quantitative MRI for Pediatric Optic Pathway Glioma Treatment ResponseUG3CA236536 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI AVERY, ROBERT ANDREW, LINGURARU, MARIUS GEORGE · 2020 to 2021
$923k
NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA236536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults and are among the most lethal. Despite aggressive treatment, the median survival rate is less than 15 months. Accurate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) tumor segmentation is critical for surgical planning, radiotherapy, and disease monitoring. While deep learning models have improved the accuracy of automated segmentation, large-scale pre-trained models generalize poorly and often underperform, producing systematic errors such as false positives, label swaps, and slice discontinuities in slices. These limitations are further compounded by unequal access to GPU resources and the growing environmental cost of large-scale model training. In this work, we propose adaptive post-processing techniques to refine the quality of glioma segmentations produced by large-scale pretrained models developed for various types of tumors. We demonstrated the techniques in multiple BraTS 2025 segmentation challenge tasks, with the ranking metric improving by 14.9 % for the sub-Saharan Africa challenge and 0.9% for the adult glioma challenge. This approach promotes a shift in brain tumor segmentation research from increasingly complex model architectures to efficient, clinically aligned post-processing strategies that are precise, computationally fair, and sustainable.

Indexed as

Brain MRIBraTS ChallengeGlioma segmentationMedical image analysisResource-aware AI

Identifiers

PMID42146716
PMCPMC13178704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.