ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Rearing and Head Scanning as Functionally Equivalent Information-Seeking Behaviors.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial memory is crucial for navigation and adapting to changing environmental conditions. Known neurophysiological mechanisms of spatial memory center on the importance of hippocampal activity and its spatial tuning. Yet, the behavioral strategies that support adaptive spatial encoding remain poorly understood. We have shown that dorsal hippocampal activity during rearing is necessary for spatial working memory, highlighting a role of information seeking behaviors for spatial memory encoding. Similarly, spatial tuning by dorsal hippocampal neurons is substantially updated during another information seeking behavior: attentive head scanning. However, the functional relationship between these behaviors is unknown. Here, to assess the relevance of environmental context for the expression of these behaviors, we quantified rearing and head scanning in a radial-arm-maze spatial working memory task while manipulating the height of the maze walls. Our goal was to test whether the stereotyped patterns of rearing that rats generate with tall walls are replaced with attentive head scanning when the walls are short enough to reach the top without rearing. We found that rats reared significantly less often when the walls were shortened and, instead, exhibited frequent attentive head scanning. The head scanning was done when and where the rats had previously exhibited stereotyped rearing. These results support the hypothesis that rearing and head scanning are functionally related behaviors. Future work should test two key inferences: 1) Head scanning is a critical epoch of spatial memory encoding, and 2) Spatial tuning by hippocampal neurons is updated during rearing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.