ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Transforming the cytokine literature into a resource for experimental analysis and discovery.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytokine biology is dispersed across hundreds of thousands of publications, making it difficult to use systematically when interpreting new experiments. Large language models (LLMs) can assist with focused literature interpretation, but ad hoc retrieval remains incomplete and unreliable. We present the Cytokine Effect Database (CytED), a framework for interfacing user-supplied experimental datasets with literature knowledge at scale. CytED uses a multi-step LLM pipeline to generate over a million cytokine-cell type-effect triples from 110,000 full-text publications, with annotations for experimental context and directional changes in genes, pathways, and cellular processes. This structure enables quantitative comparison between observed perturbation responses and prior literature across cytokines, cell types, and experimental contexts. Applied to in vitro IL-10 stimulation of PBMCs, CytED identifies unexpected pro-inflammatory features in monocytes and systematic in vivo-in vitro differences in cytotoxicity responses in CD8+ T cells. CytED infers cytokine signaling, distinguishes primary from secondary cytokine effects, and guides the design of combinatorial perturbation screens. Together, CytED establishes a general paradigm for converting unstructured domain literature into analytical tools that bridge literature and experiment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.