ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Coordinated Representational Drift Across the Mouse Cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cortical neurons continuously change their spatial tuning properties over days and weeks, yet how this representational drift is coordinated across distributed cortical networks remains unknown. Using a robotic cranial exoskeleton for chronic widefield calcium imaging with cellular resolution, we tracked over 110,000 unique layer 2/3 neurons across retrosplenial, visual, somatosensory, and motor cortices in mice navigating a figure-8 maze spanning 47 days. Single-neuron spatial tuning properties followed a posterior-to-anterior gradient, with retrosplenial and visual cortices containing the highest proportions of spatially tuned neurons. This was dissociated from local functional coupling, which was strongest in somatosensory cortex. Population activity formed a low-dimensional manifold whose geometry mirrored the structure of the maze. Despite these regional differences, all four regions decorrelated with similar exponential timescales, and session-specific deviations from each region's decay trajectory were correlated across all pairwise region combinations, suggesting that drift was coordinated rather than independent across the dorsal cortex. This coordination persisted after controlling for shared behavioral fluctuations. Furthermore, drift was consistent with an orthogonal transformation of the population code that preserved the geometric relationships between spatial representations across sessions despite continuous drift in single-neuron tuning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.