ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The reliability and accuracy of recombination inferred by Shapeit2 duoHMM on whole genome sequence.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies assessed the performance of population-based phasing combined with parental genotypes to infer recombination on whole genome sequence (WGS) data. In this study, our objective was to evaluate whether Shapeit2 duoHMM, a Hidden Markov Model using parental genotypes, infers recombination events reliably on WGS and with narrower intervals than SNP arrays. We based our analysis on the overlap between recombination events inferred by Merlin on SNP genotypes and Shapeit2 on WGS and SNP genotypes. We used a sample of 61 extended families from the GeneSTAR study with TopMED freeze 8 WGS on 580 sequenced subjects (60% of sample). Shapeit2 was run with a window size of 500 kilobases and 200 states on WGS. To mimic a SNP array, we extracted genotypes of 355,112 autosomal markers on the Illumina OmniExpress array. The number of recombination events per meiosis inferred by Shapeit2 on the WGS data (36.8) was aligned with the expected numbers over autosomes (35.7), although Merlin overestimated this number (115.0). 73% of Shapeit2 recombination events on WGS were detected by Merlin, a proportion rising to 91% when restricting to events also inferred by Shapeit2 on OmniExpress genotypes. Furthermore, Shapeit2 recombination intervals were narrower on WGS than OmniExpress genotypes (median of 4,530 bp vs. 49,458 bp). This suggests that Shapeit2 on WGS is a reliable and accurate method for inferring recombination events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.