ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Distinct sensorimotor encoding in tuft dendrites and somata associated with action, correction, and learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frontal cortex plays critical roles in action control and motor skill learning. Within the layer 1 apical tuft dendrites of layer 5 (L5) neurons in frontal cortex, precise input patterns and back-propagating action potentials can trigger powerful regenerative events that may be essential for flexible computation and learning. However, it remains unclear whether tuft activity in frontal cortical L5 circuits encodes sensorimotor information that differs from the information conveyed by their outputs to downstream targets. Using longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging, we investigated sensorimotor encoding in the apical tuft dendrites and somata of L5 extratelencephalic (ET) neurons in the frontal cortex of mice during learning of a discrete change to a cued dexterous action. During learning, movement errors either triggered corrective action or did not, allowing us to dissociate error signals from signals selective for corrective action. Somatic activity tracked both instructional cues and action, whereas tuft activity predominantly tracked instructional cues. Movement errors during learning revealed additional distinct tuft activity that was selectively associated with corrective actions. Furthermore, learning induced divergent changes in the response gain and net selectivity of tuft dendrites compared to somata. Our measurements uncover systematic differences between the tuft dendrites and somata in sensorimotor selectivity, sensitivity to corrective action, and functional plasticity, providing a foundation for investigating the contributions of dendritic computation to motor skill learning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.