ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Differentiating the Physiological Signatures of Cochlear Synaptopathy and Inner Hair Cell Damage in a Chinchilla Model.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging and noise over-exposure lead to complex mixtures of cochlear degradation that impair the structure and function of outer hair cells, inner hair cells (IHCs), and the cochlear nerve. However, IHC damage and cochlear synaptopathy (CS) remain pathologies "hidden" from the audiogram. This study aimed to identify and differentiate the physiological signatures of these two distinct pathologies using promising non-invasive assays: Envelope Following Responses (EFRs), Auditory Brainstem Response (ABRs), Wideband middle-ear reflexes (WB-MEMRs), and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs). We utilized chinchilla models of carboplatin-induced (CA) IHC damage (N = 4) and temporary threshold shift (TTS) noise-induced CS (N = 4) to compare the physiological signatures of each pathology. While both groups showed unchanged ABR thresholds two weeks after exposure, EFRs, ABR Wave V/I ratios, and MEMRs showed distinct effects of exposure. Despite non-elevated ABR-derived audiometric thresholds after exposure, both CA and TTS exposure resulted in severe in EFR "peakiness", particularly for sharp, short-duty-cycle stimuli and significant elevations in ABR Wave V/I ratios. However, these findings were less-pronounced in the TTS-exposed animals. WB-MEMR amplitudes were decreased with elevated thresholds in both groups; this effect was more pronounced in the TTS group. Opposite trends in DPOAE amplitudes indicated that while both IHC damage and CS result in similar suprathreshold temporal coding deficits, effects on outer-hair-cell integrity and auditory efferent physiology may differ between the two pathologies. Future work and novel diagnostics should aim to distinguish these specific cochlear pathologies in clinical populations, or at the very least consider their overlap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.