Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146328›Full record

ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation in the Home Environment for People With Chronic Post-Stroke Upper Limb Deficits: Preliminary Findings.

Ruchi Patel, Lisa Spinelli-Guglielmo, Kathleen A Antares, Annie Diedrich, Sarah M Zera

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05691023 (Vagus Nerve Stimulation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05691023 active not recruitingnot on this map

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) During Rehabilitation Using the Vivistim System®: Post-Market Study for Stroke Rehabilitation in a Home Environment for Subjects With Chronic Stroke (VNS-REHAB At-Home)

TypeobservationalSponsorMicroTransponder Inc.Ran2023 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Upper Extremity ProblemArmsVivistim System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruchi PatelNeuroAbilityOT, PLLC, Mooresville, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-8840
Lisa Spinelli-GuglielmoNEUROPATH Physical and Occupational Therapy, PLLC, White Plains, NY, USA.
Kathleen A AntaresMotion Craft Global, LLC, St. Petersburg, FL USA.
Annie DiedrichRise and Thrive Mobility Consultants, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Sarah M ZeraMoxie OT, PLLC, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-6798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implantable vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper limb (UL) rehabilitation (Paired VNS) is an effective therapy for chronic ischemic stroke currently being implemented in outpatient centers. However, issues such as constraints in transportation, mobility, or caregiver availability may decrease access to in-clinic therapy for some individuals. An alternative approach may be a mobile therapy model in which outpatient rehabilitation services are delivered in the individual's home. The VNS-REHAB At-Home study is a single-arm trial aimed at assessing feasibility of therapist-activated Paired VNS in the home (or mobile Paired VNS) by examining protocol compliance, therapist/patient acceptance, and safety. The goal of this report was to present the preliminary findings from the first participant cohorts. Methods: Participants completed up to 36 hours of therapist-activated mobile Paired VNS within 18 weeks. Therapist-led sessions were supplemented with self-activated VNS during UL functional tasks. The primary feasibility endpoint was the proportion of participants who completed at least 24 hours of mobile Paired VNS. Outcomes included total session hours, therapist/participant acceptance, and safety. While this study was not designed to establish definitive treatment effects, UL impairment/activity, and patient-reported measures were assessed at multiple timepoints as secondary exploratory outcomes. Results: Participants (n = 11) completed a median of 37.8 (32.5-42.4) hours of mobile Paired VNS over 13 (8-18) weeks. All participants met the primary endpoint. Overall, participants and therapists were satisfied (n = 8) or very satisfied (n = 14). Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores improved by a median of 7 points. All participants reported improvements in measures of UL use, activities of daily living, and/or participation. Adverse events were reported amongst 3 participants, and there were no serious events related to procedure or device use. Conclusions: Preliminary data from the VNS-REHAB At-Home trial demonstrate that mobile Paired VNS was successfully implemented, well-accepted, and safe in the home setting, with observed meaningful UL improvements. These initial findings support the ongoing evaluation of mobile Paired VNS as an accessible alternative to clinic-based delivery. Trial Registration: NCT05691023; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05691023.

Indexed as

health equityhome care servicesrehabilitationstrokeupper extremityvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42146328
PMCPMC13173345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.